
Launchbox 365
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date June 5, 1922
-
Sectors Information Technology
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 6
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that develops open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design offers responses comparable to other contemporary large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these 2 nations to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established competitors has been referred to as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the very first chance at what is emerging as a global AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training information open-source, enabling its code to be easily offered for usage, modification, viewing, and designing files for building functions. [13] The company supposedly intensely recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ understanding and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, meaning its code is freely offered for use, adjustment, and viewing. This includes consent to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to style files, for constructing functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip restrictions on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial basic intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were hesitant in supplying funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to produce an exit in a brief time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being known as the driver for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI models to complete with the business. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was lucrative compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also permits its technology to prevent the most strict provisions of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to adhere to the government’s controls on details. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to most brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals with no computer system science background to help its technology understand other subjects and knowledge locations, including having the ability to generate poetry and carry out well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available free of charge to both researchers and business users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and accountable downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than many open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the 2 Base models was also released simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that may not be. They found this to aid with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become overly depended on, while other specialists might be rarely utilized, wasting specifications. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are equally used then triggers specialists to duplicate the very same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to learn core capacities that are typically used, and let the routed experts to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a procedure benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit design was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit design was constantly updated during training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in two phases. The first phase was trained to fix math and coding issues. This stage used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit model was by hand set. All trained benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had “special qualities” various from RL on general information. For instance, RL on reasoning could improve over more training steps. [31]
The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and trained similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of experts (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math problems was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was created by a benefit design trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by “professional models”. Non-reasoning data was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “professional designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and verify throughout thinking. Then the professional models were RL using an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional design was trained to create simply artificial reasoning information in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information consisting of both final reward and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The reward model produced reward signals for both concerns with objective however free-form responses, and concerns without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team carried out substantial low-level engineering to accomplish performance. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, requiring special GEMM regimens to build up properly. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific maker each expert was on in order to avoid specific makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available through DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed efficiency of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information generated by R1. [47]
A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant first considers the thinking process in the mind and then offers the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed response is appropriate (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to attend to these concerns and further enhance thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to concerns, solves logic issues and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent constructing its latest AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably minimal cost has been recognized as possibly challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was supposedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current models when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to supply opinions and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has actually highlighted possible limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export restrictions on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models as a result “sparked market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in major global technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was cleaned off American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very outstanding”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed apprehension of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the appropriate performance of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the official application programs user interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for subjects that are considered politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For instance, the model declines to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially create an answer, but then erases it quickly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s talk about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can only be gotten rid of to a restricted extent in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and specified: “We securely oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering specific answers to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some specialists fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions state “We keep the info we collect in safe servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our model and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had begun a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s use of individual details. [83]
Expert system industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design seems one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model development highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely remarkable”: “We must take the advancements out of China really, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data personal privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for details from DeepSeek on information security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.